<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Isakson Urges Caution on $1 Trillion Health Care Reform That Will Put Government in Unfair Competition with Private Market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.120politics.com/2009/06/isakson-urges-caution-on-1-trillion-health-care-reform-that-will-put-government-in-unfair-competition-with-private-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.120politics.com/2009/06/isakson-urges-caution-on-1-trillion-health-care-reform-that-will-put-government-in-unfair-competition-with-private-market/</link>
	<description>Objectively Partisan from Marietta To Roswell</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 21:52:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhilWolf</title>
		<link>http://www.120politics.com/2009/06/isakson-urges-caution-on-1-trillion-health-care-reform-that-will-put-government-in-unfair-competition-with-private-market/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>PhilWolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.120politics.com/?p=317#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Caution?  Isakson urges caution?  Better yet, how about showing us the Constitutional authorization for the US govt to get involved in health care AT ALL.  This is a prime example of how there is not a dimes worth of difference between the two parties.  Is he proposing that scaled down, government managed health care, aka socialized medicine, is compatible with a free market and individual liberty but the $1T dem version is not?  Puleeeeze.  Go home Juanny.  You&#039;ve shown your true colors and we don&#039;t like them. 
   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caution?  Isakson urges caution?  Better yet, how about showing us the Constitutional authorization for the US govt to get involved in health care AT ALL.  This is a prime example of how there is not a dimes worth of difference between the two parties.  Is he proposing that scaled down, government managed health care, aka socialized medicine, is compatible with a free market and individual liberty but the $1T dem version is not?  Puleeeeze.  Go home Juanny.  You&#039;ve shown your true colors and we don&#039;t like them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

